[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Treelayout and CGS
From: |
R! |
Subject: |
Re: Treelayout and CGS |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:12:53 -0800 (PST) |
Hi,
So there is a second version, i clean cgs procedure so now it fit more the
codding standards. I also find one bug which is solved now.
In treelayout I also made some cleanup but I don't wont change the variable
name much.I know that it's bad to have CamelCase variable but these script
is closely conected with treeplot where are also these variables.
New version:
http://www.nabble.com/file/p20591667/cgs.m cgs.m
http://www.nabble.com/file/p20591667/treelayout.m treelayout.m
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Treelayout-and-CGS-tp20446040p20591667.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Treelayout and CGS, R!, 2008/11/11
- Re: Treelayout and CGS, David Bateman, 2008/11/14
- Re: Treelayout and CGS, David Bateman, 2008/11/14
- Re: Treelayout and CGS, R!, 2008/11/14
- Re: Treelayout and CGS, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/11/14
- Re: Treelayout and CGS, David Bateman, 2008/11/14
- Re: Treelayout and CGS,
R! <=
- Re: Treelayout and CGS, David Bateman, 2008/11/19
- Re: Treelayout and CGS, R!, 2008/11/21
- Re: Treelayout and CGS, David Bateman, 2008/11/21
- Re: Treelayout and CGS, R!, 2008/11/25
- Re: Treelayout and CGS, David Bateman, 2008/11/25