[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: checked int-int conversions
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: checked int-int conversions |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:02:48 -0400 |
On 30-Jul-2008, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
| A good idea - I forgot to check the Matlab counterparts. Should I
| resubmit the patch (given that this is, as I understand, a trivial
| change)?
I've already checked it in to my archive, so I'll fix it up. It
should be pushed to the public archive soon.
I'm also eliminating the trunc_flag thing in favor of passing an
additional argument by reference to the constructor. To me, the extra
argument seems better than having a static data member for this purpose.
jwe