[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: imread
From: |
Søren Hauberg |
Subject: |
Re: imread |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Jul 2008 22:38:39 +0200 |
tir, 01 07 2008 kl. 12:41 -0400, skrev Thomas Scofield:
> I have modified imread to use GraphicsMagick libraries in place of
> ImageMagick ones. The version of imread I worked from is the one
> in the latest stable(?) release from octave-forge, not the one
> in development. (I'm not yet admitted to the developers list.)
Great to see somebody take on this task :-)
I don't think there has been any changes to imread/write in a while so
it's probably fine to use the version in the latest 'image' package. But
even if you don't have a developers account for Octave Forge, you can do
a check out of the SVN -- you just can't check things in.
> So, just how and to whom should I submit the changed files for review
> by others?
If you're looking for code reviews, I think it's okay to simply post the
source code on this list. I don't think you're modifying any files in
Octave, so I'm guessing it's okay if you don't send a changeset at first
(when you have the final version ready, a changeset will probably be
required...)
Søren
- imread, Thomas Scofield, 2008/07/01
- Re: imread, Michael Goffioul, 2008/07/01
- Re: imread,
Søren Hauberg <=
- Re: imread, Thomas Scofield, 2008/07/01
- Re: imread, Søren Hauberg, 2008/07/02
- Re: imread, Thomas Scofield, 2008/07/02
- Re: imread, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/07/02
- Re: imread, Thomas Weber, 2008/07/03
- Re: imread, Thomas Scofield, 2008/07/03
- Re: imread, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/10
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: imread, Thomas L. Scofield, 2008/07/11
- Re: imread, Thomas L. Scofield, 2008/07/11
- Re: imread, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/11