[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "whos -all" and "who -all" fail
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: "whos -all" and "who -all" fail |
Date: |
Tue, 06 May 2008 12:18:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080306) |
John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 5-May-2008, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>
> | FWIW, I like the 'who -all' command, because it is the only way to recall a
> command
> | that I know exists but I can't spell it. Also, it's useful for exploring
> around
> | octave.
>
> What about "help"? With no arguments it lists all the functions.
>
> jwe
>
>
But it doesn't return subfunction names..
D.
--
David Bateman address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
Re: "whos -all" and "who -all" fail, David Bateman, 2008/05/05