Re: merging imread and imwrite

[Michael Goffioul]

On Mon, Feb 4, 2008 at 8:44 AM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> On  1-Feb-2008, Michael Goffioul wrote:
>
> | Given the common origin of ImageMagick and GraphicsMagick, I'm
> | alwo wondering if the code could be made compilable with one or
> | the other?
>
> If the functions we need from Magick++ have the same signature, then I
> don't see why not.  But I don't want to have to do a lot of work to
> adapt to multiple interfaces, so it is also fine with me if we simply
> require the Magick++ library from the GraphicsMagick package.

In the end, I could compile GraphicsMagick and ImageMagick under
MSVC, so it doesn't really matter (I only compiled GraphicsMagick
when I sent the previous mail...). Just use the more appropriate.

Michael.