[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: distributed version control
From: |
Jason Riedy |
Subject: |
Re: distributed version control |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:23:27 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
And Soren Hauberg writes:
> But just for record: 'I don't really care'.
For sometimes contributors (like me, I hope), git can work well
as a client for CVS or SVN. Hence, don't consider my personal
git use as a request for any change.
git can work with mercurial as well, but you end up with a full
hg repo as well as a full git repo. Both the packed repo sizes
are smaller than the unpacked source, so it probably doesn't
matter.
But if anyone cares, my git sync command is:
git cvsimport -d :ext:address@hidden:/cvs -a -v -m -o origin octave
Jason
- Re: distributed version control, (continued)
Re: distributed version control, tarmigan, 2008/01/16
- Re: distributed version control, tarmigan, 2008/01/17
- Re: distributed version control, John W. Eaton, 2008/01/17
- Re: distributed version control, tarmigan, 2008/01/17
- Re: distributed version control, tarmigan, 2008/01/18
- Re: distributed version control, John W. Eaton, 2008/01/18
- Re: distributed version control, Søren Hauberg, 2008/01/18
- Re: distributed version control,
Jason Riedy <=
- Re: distributed version control, tarmigan, 2008/01/18
- Re: distributed version control, Peter A. Gustafson, 2008/01/18
- Re: distributed version control, John W. Eaton, 2008/01/18
- Re: distributed version control, Peter A. Gustafson, 2008/01/18
Re: distributed version control, David Bateman, 2008/01/28