[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
Subject: |
Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Jan 2008 10:44:29 +0100 |
On 1/4/08, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> with the crash happening at the "function = octave_value ()"
> assignment, apparently when rep is deleted in the assignment
> operator. So what is function at this point? I think it should be an
> undefined octave_value object. What is it's rep? What is it's
> rep->count (apprently only 1 at this point, otherwise it would not be
> deleted in the assignment operator)?
The count is indeed 1, but rep is not undefined: it's an octave_dld_function
that corresponds to the autoloaded gnuplot_binary function from
__gnuplot_raw__.oct.
Michael.
- octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, John W. Eaton, 2008/01/04
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, Michael Goffioul, 2008/01/04
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, John W. Eaton, 2008/01/04
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault,
Michael Goffioul <=
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, Michael Goffioul, 2008/01/05
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, John W. Eaton, 2008/01/05
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, Michael Goffioul, 2008/01/05
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, Michael Goffioul, 2008/01/07
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, John W. Eaton, 2008/01/07
- Re: octave-3.0.0+ segmentation fault, Michael Goffioul, 2008/01/08