octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Octave project involvement


From: John W. Eaton
Subject: Re: Octave project involvement
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:01:49 -0400

On  7-Sep-2007, David Bateman wrote:

| so the bsxfun function is slightly slower than the repmat, but doesn't
| use the additional memory. The reason bsxfun is slower than it needs to
| be is that it can make no assumption that the matrix type returned from
| the feval will be the same at each call,

Even for the built-in functions listed in Matlab docs for bsxfun?  Are
you thinking of cases where a complex value can be generated from real
arguments, for example?  At least in those cases, I think it doesn't
matter for Matlab because a complex variable is just a double value
with a complex part.  But it does matter for Octave since real and
complex are separate types.

jwe


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]