[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: polyint vs polyinteg
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: polyint vs polyinteg |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:06:24 -0400 |
On 31-Aug-2007, David Bateman wrote:
| John W. Eaton wrote:
| > On 31-Aug-2007, Sylvain Pelissier wrote:
| >
| > | I have already done a polyint function in Octave forge. You could use it
| > | if it could help and tell me when I could delete it in Octave forge.
| >
| > It looks like your polyint function is just a wrapper around
| > polyinteg. We need it to be the other way around: polyint should be
| > the real function and polyinteg (which will be deprecated and removed
| > in the future) should call polyint to do the real work (assuming that
| > it is possible to do that while retaining the existing interface for
| > polyinteg, for backward compatibility).
| >
| > jwe
| >
|
| Then what about the attached..
OK, please check it in.
Thanks,
jwe