[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Code after sub-functions?
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
Subject: |
Re: Code after sub-functions? |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:19:54 +0200 |
On 8/24/07, David Bateman <address@hidden> wrote:
> is correct. This syntax is legal as Matlab doesn't require functions to
> be terminates with an "end" keyword, except when nested functions are
> used for the parent and nested functions. Octave only duplicates the
> previous syntax for sub-functions. So I'm afraid you have two issues
> here. Firstly the unexecuted code, and seconding do the nested functions
> make use of variables in the scope of the parent?
Yes. But I'm still not there yet. There's still a lot porting work to do on
my side (in JHandles). So I can't check if I have scoping problems.
Michael.