[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why is NaN used as extrapolation value?
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: Why is NaN used as extrapolation value? |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:00:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060921) |
Søren Hauberg wrote:
>
>
> David Bateman skrev:
>> Søren Hauberg wrote:
>>> Would this cause incompatibilities? I mean, 'isnan(NA)' produces
>>> 'true' since 'NA' is a NaN.
>> I'm sure some users will find a way to make it incompatible like "(val
>> == NaN)" for example :-)
> Hey, now you're just making stuff up :-)
> That wouldn't work since 'NaN ==NaN' returns false.
Soren,
I have no objections to such a change, but only if it doesn't cause more
bug reports. If you are sure that the only way to check for NaN is the
"isnan" function then why not..
D.
--
David Bateman address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
- Why is NaN used as extrapolation value?, Søren Hauberg, 2007/06/16
- Re: Why is NaN used as extrapolation value?, David Bateman, 2007/06/18
- Re: Why is NaN used as extrapolation value?, Søren Hauberg, 2007/06/18
- Re: Why is NaN used as extrapolation value?, David Bateman, 2007/06/18
- Re: Why is NaN used as extrapolation value?, Søren Hauberg, 2007/06/18
- Re: Why is NaN used as extrapolation value?,
David Bateman <=
- Re: Why is NaN used as extrapolation value?, Søren Hauberg, 2007/06/18
- Re: Why is NaN used as extrapolation value?, Søren Hauberg, 2007/06/18
- Re: Why is NaN used as extrapolation value?, John W. Eaton, 2007/06/18