[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.9.11?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: 2.9.11? |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:27:33 -0400 |
On 19-Apr-2007, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
| So, it looks like the failing case is sqrt(-Inf). OK, now where is the
complex
| version of square root, std::sqrt? :-)
It depends on your system. With GCC, it would be in the complex
header file that is part of libstdc++. Depending on compiler version
and options it could actually be defined using one of the C99
functions which are apparently built-in functions in GCC.
Anyway, I don't think it is a bug in Octave.
jwe
- Re: 2.9.11?, (continued)
- Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/18
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
- sqrt(-Inf) (was Re: 2.9.11?), Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/20
- Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/20
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/20