[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.9.11?
From: |
Thomas Weber |
Subject: |
Re: 2.9.11? |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:47:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.5 |
Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2007 19:01 schrieb John W. Eaton:
> On 19-Apr-2007, Thomas Weber wrote:
> | This is an issue we are facing in Debian as well: how to pass additional
> | flags to the configure script.
>
> What additional flags?
At this point? None, at least for the packages I've looked at[1]. But imagine
bindings for any outside library one needs, just for this package (the audio
package might for example use libsndfile[2]) and the headers or libs are in a
location that's not probed for by the configure script.
That said, this is currently a brain storming. We might well end up with not
passing anything to ./configure, but Ithink it would be good if there was the
possibility.
[1] I originally thought we could pass --with-mpath etc. to the individual
packages' configure commands, but later realised that we don't call "make
install", so this would be pointless.
[2] http://www.mega-nerd.com/libsndfile/
Regards
Thomas
- Re: 2.9.11?, (continued)
- Re: 2.9.11?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Thomas Weber, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Paul Kienzle, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/25
- Re: 2.9.11?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/04/25
- Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?,
Thomas Weber <=
- Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/04/19
Re: 2.9.11?, A S Hodel, 2007/04/18
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/18
- Re: 2.9.11?, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2007/04/18
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/18
- Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/18
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19