Re: Rewritten version of bar.m

[David Bateman]

John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 18-Apr-2007, David Bateman wrote:
> 
> | converting it to use patches would be trivial. I'm not sure what a
> | barseries really is..
> 
> I'm pretty sure I don't understand the group thing yet, but I'd bet
> that it is eventually what we will have to do for compatibility.
> 
> | That would work as long as you don't mind an additional internal function
> 
> Once we have private functions, we could make it private, but for now
> just naming it __bar__ would be OK with me.
> 
> jwe
> 

Frankly, in the long run I'd rather have someone like Shai responsible
for maintaining the graphic handles in the octave core, and so I'd
rather make sure of what he'd prefer to see done for bar/barh rather
than try and push any code from me..

D.