octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2.9.10, finally?


From: Daniel J Sebald
Subject: Re: 2.9.10, finally?
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:12:11 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041020

John W. Eaton wrote:
On 21-Mar-2007, Daniel J Sebald wrote:

| John W. Eaton wrote:
| | > - It is no longer possible to mix Matlab-style plot commands with
| >     the old (and now really obsolete) style of plot commands
| >     (__gnuplot_set__, etc.).  You can do one or the other, but not
| >     both for the same plot.
| | Not true. In fact, it currently may be the best setup yet. Consider the following: | | image
| ps = get(gcf,"__plot_stream__")
| fprintf(ps,"unset colorbox\n")
| fprintf(ps,"replot\n")
| fflush(ps)

OK, but I'd rather not recommend doing this sort of thing.

At the very least, we should tell people that if they do tricky things
like this, then their code will depend explicitly on gnuplot, which
will make it fail for other graphics backends.

Not recommended, but it is a non-portable way of accessing the external graphics engine and possibly using otherwise unreachable features. I think that is a good thing. Don't have to mention "gnuplot", simply that __gnuplot_set__, etc are gone.

Dan


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]