[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New function proposal
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: New function proposal |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:08:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060921) |
address@hidden wrote:
> > For now, please leave the POSIX code in lo-syscalls and put the
> > Windows code in sysdep.
>
> Here it is (with the NULL replacement as well).
>
> Michael.
>
>
>
>
Ok, I'm now compiling this. However, I'd like to add a unit test to the
popen2 code. Taking the example code from popen2 and modifying it
slightly I have a test like
[in, out, pid] = popen2 ("sort", "-nr");
fputs (in, "these\nare\nsome\nstrings\n");
fclose (in);
EAGAIN = errno ("EAGAIN");
done = false;
str = {};
idx= 0;
do
s = fgets (out);
if (ischar (s))
idx++;
str{idx} = s;
elseif (errno () == EAGAIN)
sleep (0.1);
fclear (out);
else
done = true;
endif
until (done)
fclose (out);
assert(str,{"these\n","strings\n","some\n","are\n"})
However, this of course won't work on MSVC.. Is there a generic program
I can use on all platforms for the popen. If not what is an appropriate
test for MSVC? Then I'd do something like
if (isunix())
[in, out, pid] = popen2 ("sort", "-nr");
fputs (in, "these\nare\nsome\nstrings\n");
fclose (in);
EAGAIN = errno ("EAGAIN");
done = false;
str = {};
idx= 0;
do
s = fgets (out);
if (ischar (s))
idx++;
str{idx} = s;
elseif (errno () == EAGAIN)
sleep (0.1);
fclear (out);
else
done = true;
endif
until (done)
fclose (out);
assert(str,{"these\n","strings\n","some\n","are\n"})
else
## INSERT MSVC/MINGW/CYGWIN TEST HERE!!!
endif
Cheers
David
--
David Bateman address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
- Re: New function proposal, (continued)
RE: Re: New function proposal, michael . goffioul, 2007/02/13
RE: Re: New function proposal, michael . goffioul, 2007/02/15
RE: Re: New function proposal, michael . goffioul, 2007/02/15
RE: Re: New function proposal, michael . goffioul, 2007/02/15
RE: RE: Re: New function proposal, michael . goffioul, 2007/02/15
- Re: New function proposal,
David Bateman <=
RE: Re: New function proposal, michael . goffioul, 2007/02/15
RE: Re: New function proposal, michael . goffioul, 2007/02/15
- Re: New function proposal, David Bateman, 2007/02/15
- Re: New function proposal, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/15
- Re: New function proposal, David Bateman, 2007/02/16
- Re: New function proposal, David Bateman, 2007/02/16
- Re: New function proposal, Michael Goffioul, 2007/02/16