[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autoloading of toolboxes?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Autoloading of toolboxes? |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:15:27 -0500 |
On 29-Jan-2007, David Bateman wrote:
| John W. Eaton wrote:
| > I don't think it is a good idea to load all packages by default. That
| > Octave Forge was typically packaged and distributed this way is
| > something that I've never really liked, and was the reason I wanted to
| > have a package system that would make it easy to install add-ons in
| > smaller chunks.
| >
| > jwe
| >
| >
| However, its not the behavior someone coming from the matlab world will
| expect and we will be punished for the current behavior...
I think I misunderstood Bill's comments. I was thinking about the
distribution of the packages, not how they are loaded once installed.
See my second message on this topic (a reply to your initial message).
jwe
- Autoloading of toolboxes?, David Bateman, 2007/01/29
- Re: Autoloading of toolboxes?, Michael Creel, 2007/01/29
- Re: Autoloading of toolboxes?, Søren Hauberg, 2007/01/29
- Re: Autoloading of toolboxes?, David Bateman, 2007/01/29
- Re: Autoloading of toolboxes?, Bill Denney, 2007/01/29
- Re: Autoloading of toolboxes?, David Bateman, 2007/01/30
- Re: Autoloading of toolboxes?, David Bateman, 2007/01/30
Autoloading of toolboxes?, John W. Eaton, 2007/01/29