|
From: | Søren Hauberg |
Subject: | Re: packaging system |
Date: | Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:55:34 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) |
Stefan van der Walt wrote: [snip]
I see. I didn't know matlab had such a functionality. The package structure offers the same, but only per package. So if a toolbox consists of several packages, there would be a need for aIn the end, one should be able to do help('toolboxname') And get something similar to the MATLAB output: Signal Processing Toolbox funname - Short Description The Short Description can be dynamically extracted from each file on its own -- we just need the funname -> toolbox relationship, as well as toolbox descriptions. If the package structure offers this, it's fine.
toolbox -> package1, ..., packageN relationship.So the question is, to which extend should packages and toolboxes differ? Do we need toolboxes if we have packages?
/Søren
Regards Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |