[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: packaging system
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: packaging system |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:32:46 -0400 |
On 15-Jun-2005, Quentin Spencer wrote:
| I really don't see this packaging
| approach being particularly practical for compiled code--the sheer
| number of possible OSs and architectures (especially with the increasing
| popularity of x86_64-specific Linux distributions) becomes quickly
| unmanageable.
I have no plans for binary packages. If a package contains the source
for .oct files, then you will need to have a system capable of running
mkoctfile. After downloading, the package is compiled, then installed.
I think this is similar to what happens if you download a package from
CPAN that includes C (or other compiled-language) code.
jwe
- packaging system, Stefan van der Walt, 2005/06/15
- Re: packaging system, Quentin Spencer, 2005/06/15
- Re: packaging system,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: packaging system, Przemek Klosowski, 2005/06/17
- Re: packaging system, Søren Hauberg, 2005/06/17
- Re: packaging system, John W. Eaton, 2005/06/17
- Re: packaging system, Søren Hauberg, 2005/06/17
- Re: packaging system, Søren Hauberg, 2005/06/17
- Re: packaging system, Stefan van der Walt, 2005/06/18
- Re: packaging system, Søren Hauberg, 2005/06/18
- Re: packaging system, Stefan van der Walt, 2005/06/18
- Re: packaging system, Søren Hauberg, 2005/06/18
- Re: packaging system, Stefan van der Walt, 2005/06/18