[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.1.65 snapshot soon?
From: |
Todd Neal |
Subject: |
Re: 2.1.65 snapshot soon? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:21:45 -0600 |
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 20:59:03 -0700, Dmitri A. Sergatskov <address@hidden> wrote:
> Dmitri A. Sergatskov wrote:
> ...
> > I just noticed that "ls" on solaris would not work (returns nothing), while
> > system("ls") works fine. I am still investigating and in any case seems
> > to be a minor problem...
> >
>
> I guess it is just the same problem as
>
> http://www.octave.org/octave-lists/archive/bug-octave.2004/msg00167.html
>
> Oh well...
>
> Dmitri.
Can you test and see if modifying __kluge_procbuf_delay__ fixes the problem ?
octave:39> __kluge_procbuf_delay__=10
__kluge_procbuf_delay__ = 10
Todd
- 2.1.65 snapshot soon?, John W. Eaton, 2005/02/11
- Re: 2.1.65 snapshot soon?, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/11
- Re: 2.1.65 snapshot soon?, John W. Eaton, 2005/02/14
- Re: 2.1.65 snapshot soon?, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/14
- Re: 2.1.65 snapshot soon?, John W. Eaton, 2005/02/14
- Re: 2.1.65 snapshot soon?, John W. Eaton, 2005/02/15