[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ISO C++ and Octave
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: ISO C++ and Octave |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:55:47 -0600 |
On 31-Jan-2001, Mumit Khan <address@hidden> wrote:
| On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, John W. Eaton wrote:
|
| > | I had missed the -MT option, thanks for pointing it out. Yet another
| > | little thing that configure has to do.
| >
| > But why the change? This seems like something that is going to cause
| > trouble for a lot of packages.
| >
|
| [ I'm not on the Octave maintainers list, so please Cc me if appropriate ]
|
| How about the following? Should work for existing gcc as well. Caveat,
| untested.
I applied this patch too. It seems to work.
Thanks,
jwe
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, (continued)
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/30
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave,
John W. Eaton <=
- Patch [Re: ISO C++ and Octave], Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/30