|
From: | Guillaume |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #43742] ifft, ifft2, ifftn should accept 'nonsymmetric' and 'symmetric' options |
Date: | Sun, 19 Dec 2021 13:06:56 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:94.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/94.0 |
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #43742 (project octave): Thank you for this. I do not know when the option was introduced in Matlab but it would definitely be a good feature to have in Octave; I came across the compatibility issue again this week. I currently use the workaround "real(ifft(X))": if the only consequence is that it is slower and uses more memory, it would still be useful to have it in place until a proper implementation is added. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?43742> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |