[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60237] Differente behaviour in anonymous function handling

[Denis Sbragion]

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #60237 (project octave):

Hello Dmitri ans Markus,

thanks for your reply.

[comment #1 comment #1:]
> The code does not appear to be complete.
> What are: ol, p, sl? 

Of course it isn't, the whole code is thousands of lines. The variables are of
course all defined, else it wouldn't work with 5.2.0 or the optim package
either. Some explanation:

nl, cl, gl: all double column vectors of the same size. Size of these depends
on the problem size and goes from few to thousands. Tested with different
sizes with the same result.

p, f, mm, ol: all double scalars.

I have to add that all the code has been thoroughly tested under 5.2.0 and
previous versions going back to 4, solving reliably tens of thousands of
similar problems of varying size. All the code, except for the optimization
routine, is pure Octave code. No other external library is involved.
 
> If I fake those the code finishes w/o error that you see
> on a recent octave 6.2.1 (6.3 pre-release). 
> You can try a recent windows builds from 
> https://buildbot.octave.space/#/download

I'll try ASAP and let you know.

Thanks again.

Bye,

Denis Sbragion

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60237>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/