[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60137] Closures: differences in behavior with
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60137] Closures: differences in behavior with MatLAB |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Mar 2021 21:39:10 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0 |
Update of bug #60137 (project octave):
Status: None => Confirmed
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #1:
Confirmed. A simpler example is
function fh = test_nested_func ()
x = sin (pi);
y = 13;
function nested_func ()
y %% OK
x %% UNDEFINED
endfunction
fh = @nested_func;
endfunction
then I see the following:
octave:1> fh = test_nested_func ()
fh = @nested_func
octave:2> fh ()
y = 13
error: 'x' undefined near line 6, column 6
error: called from
test_nested_func>nested_func at line 6 column 5
It's quite strange that the value of Y is captured, but not X in this
example.
This problem happens with current default, stable, 6.2.0, and 6.1.0. Since
handles to nested functions were introduced in 6.1.0, I'm not sure this can
really be considered a regression, but it is something that should work. I'll
look at fixing it for 6.3.0.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60137>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60137] Closures: differences in behavior with MatLAB,
John W. Eaton <=