|
From: | Pantxo Diribarne |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58376] Request for better looking tex superscripts and subscripts |
Date: | Fri, 15 May 2020 18:25:49 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:75.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/75.0 |
URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58376> Summary: Request for better looking tex superscripts and subscripts Project: GNU Octave Submitted by: pantxo Submitted on: ven. 15 mai 2020 22:25:47 UTC Category: Plotting with OpenGL Severity: 1 - Wish Priority: 5 - Normal Item Group: Feature Request Status: Confirmed Assigned to: None Originator Name: Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Release: dev Discussion Lock: Any Operating System: Any _______________________________________________________ Details: I attached a figure (orig.png) in which I compared the output of Octave's internal tex renderer (with default and STIX font) and LaTeX's. Needless to say that I prefer Latex's output. The main problem is that Octave exaggerates baseline shifts and scales them with the font ascender and descender. Those can be overly large for fonts like STIX that have large math symbols. The second problem is that subscript nested in superscript are not correctly handled. I attached modififed.png which I obtained changing how octave handles baseline offsets and font size. I'll attach the corresponding simple patch when I have a bug number. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58376> _______________________________________________ Message posté via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |