[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57613] Codespell report for "Octave" 5.1.90 (on fossies.org)

[anonymous]

Follow-up Comment #15, bug #57613 (project octave):

Ok, the qterminal files are now ignored.

To the correct tessalate spelling I cannot really contribute, but I found
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50411 which reflects the results
of a short Google search. So on Fossies at least the according words are
marked orange (meaning something like "acceptable").

Mike, the offered tarballs are also on Fossies "codespell" checked but the
tarball names don't contain a version part what is principally ok but for
Fossies not really suited so I added simply the date of the latest member file
in the tarball name. I'm just unsure what would be a meaningful informative
and unique tarball name here. But using that files is really easier but since
they at least currently seem not up-to-date I added nevertheless a file using
the "hg locate"-method to have integrated the latest spelling changes.

So there are now
 
 
https://fossies.org/https://fossies.org/linux/test/octave-27971_ec769a7ab9fb.200121_1712.hg_locate.tar.gz

and

 https://fossies.org/linux/test/octave-stable.200120_2319.tar.gz/codespell.html
 https://fossies.org/linux/test/octave-default.200120_2138.tar.gz/codespell.html

So besides of the open "tesselate" question all spelling errors and typos (at
least that "codespell" has found) are corrected. Great!

By the way, John, if your correction method using Emacs may be generally
useful you could eventually share your experiences in a "codespell" issue or
send me a personal mail. At least your comment has animated me to write a
shell script calling the "vi" editor (but although it works now principally
I'm not yet really convinced of the benefit). 

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57613>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/