[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mysterious c0 80
From: |
Michael Richardson |
Subject: |
Re: mysterious c0 80 |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Jan 2024 21:17:24 -0500 |
David Levine <levinedl@acm.org> wrote:
>> =======================
>> All 101 tests passed
>> (19 tests were not run)
>> =======================
> That's good. Though I'm surprised that 19 tests weren't run. That
happens
> when nmh isn't configured with some options. 19 seems high to me.
could be.
It would be some library test, as I basically just --prefix=/sandel
>> I tried running "test/post/test-post-basic" manually, and it seemed to
just
>> install stuff to test/testdir/inst, but I couldn't tell if it actually
ran a
>> test. Do I need some arguments to the test?
> No, the tests don't take arguments. Some require helper programs. To
make
> sure those are built, it's best to run a single test this way:
> make check TESTS=test/post/test-post-basic
make[1]: Entering directory '/sandel/src/nmh'
PASS: test/post/test-post-basic
=============
1 test passed
=============
make[1]: Leaving directory '/sandel/src/nmh'
In pretty green.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: mysterious c0 80, David Levine, 2024/01/01
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Ken Hornstein, 2024/01/01
- Re: mysterious c0 80, David Levine, 2024/01/01
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Michael Richardson, 2024/01/01
- Re: mysterious c0 80, David Levine, 2024/01/01
- Re: mysterious c0 80,
Michael Richardson <=
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Ken Hornstein, 2024/01/02
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Ralph Corderoy, 2024/01/02
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Michael Richardson, 2024/01/02
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Ken Hornstein, 2024/01/02
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Michael Richardson, 2024/01/02
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Ralph Corderoy, 2024/01/03
- Re: mysterious c0 80, David Levine, 2024/01/03
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Ralph Corderoy, 2024/01/04
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Ken Hornstein, 2024/01/04
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Ralph Corderoy, 2024/01/04