[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: multiply linked emails
From: |
Valdis Klētnieks |
Subject: |
Re: multiply linked emails |
Date: |
Sat, 30 May 2020 18:22:35 -0400 |
On Fri, 29 May 2020 14:41:05 -0400, Ken Hornstein said:
> > 2) would it be reasonable to have a mh-format that returned the number of
> > hard links so that I could see in my scan that it was also stored
> > elsewhere?
>
> That should be relatively straightforward, although it sounds like a bunch
> of layer violations to me (not that we really have many layers in nmh,
> but we should!). Again, it has limited utility if the filesystem doesn't
> support hard links.
Well, if the system is Unixoid enough to *have* a stat() system call, and you
stat() a file on a file system that doesn't support multiple hard links, it
will just set the stat.st_nlink field to 1. And I'm going to make a guess that
most nmh users are using a sane filesystem that does have multiple links.
The bigger thing will be bulletproofing it for things like the purported file
actually being a directory or a symlink or other non-file entity.
pgpy8QRTepv6x.pgp
Description: PGP signature