[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 4 of 108 tests failed testing nmh
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: 4 of 108 tests failed testing nmh |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Nov 2019 09:11:49 -0500 |
>> ANOTHER follow-up ... that bug is not present in 1.7.1. I would advise
>> you use that.
>
>Confirmed. There is a compile warning due to not including a correct
>header without READLINE_SUPPORT, I just fixed that.
Huh, I guess the core problem was without a prototype that function
had a default return type of "int", not "char **", and the return pointer
was getting mangled. At least that was an easy one!
--Ken
- Re: 4 of 108 tests failed testing nmh, (continued)
- Re: 4 of 108 tests failed testing nmh, Valdis Klētnieks, 2019/11/07
- Re: 4 of 108 tests failed testing nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2019/11/07
- RE: 4 of 108 tests failed testing nmh, Chris Richmond, 2019/11/07
- Re: 4 of 108 tests failed testing nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2019/11/07
- RE: 4 of 108 tests failed testing nmh, Chris Richmond, 2019/11/07
- Re: 4 of 108 tests failed testing nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2019/11/07
- Re: 4 of 108 tests failed testing nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2019/11/07
- Re: 4 of 108 tests failed testing nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2019/11/07
- Re: 4 of 108 tests failed testing nmh, David Levine, 2019/11/07
- RE: 4 of 108 tests failed testing nmh, Chris Richmond, 2019/11/08
- Re: 4 of 108 tests failed testing nmh,
Ken Hornstein <=
- RE: 4 of 108 tests failed testing nmh, Chris Richmond, 2019/11/07