Re: [nmh-workers] Stupid 'pick' question...

[Bakul Shah]

On 12 Jun 2019 08:46:43 -0600 "Andy Bradford" <address@hidden> wrote:
> [ part  - text/plain -   577B  ]
> Thus said "Valdis Kl?tnieks" on Sat, 08 Jun 2019 21:26:46 -0400:
> 
> > In  a world  of Microsoft  Office  attachments, is  having -search  go
> > through the body by default as well  still a good idea? Maybe having a
> > separate -searchbody would be better?
> 
> Hard to  say what  it *should*  be. In my  environment, the  majority of
> messages that I use -search with  do have searchable content in the body
> of the message, so I've never really been concerned about it.
> 
> Andy
> --
> TAI64 timestamp: 400000005d011078

It's funny you say that! I did

pick -search Micro cur

"cur" being your message, and the search failed. The reason
being the body was MIME encoded because of UTF-8 even though
it is plain text.  Here is a sample of what you see with

show -noshowproc

Cc: address@hidden
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: nmh-workers-bounces+bakul=address@hidden
Sender: "nmh-workers" <nmh-workers-bounces+bakul=address@hidden>

VGh1cyBzYWlkICJWYWxkaXMgS2w/dG5pZWtzIiBvbiBTYXQsIDA4IEp1biAyMDE5IDIxOjI2OjQ2
IC0wNDAwOgoKPiBJbiAgYSB3b3JsZCAgb2YgTWljcm9zb2Z0ICBPZmZpY2UgIGF0dGFjaG1lbnRz
LCBpcyAgaGF2aW5nIC1zZWFyY2ggIGdvCj4gdGhyb3VnaCB0aGUgYm9keSBieSBkZWZhdWx0IGFz
IHdlbGwgIHN0aWxsIGEgZ29vZCBpZGVhPyBNYXliZSBoYXZpbmcgYQo+IHNlcGFyYXRlIC1zZWFy
Y2hib2R5IHdvdWxkIGJlIGJldHRlcj8KCkhhcmQgdG8gIHNheSB3aGF0ICBpdCAqc2hvdWxkKiAg