[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Re: symlinks support [Was: Future of monotone]
From: |
Lapo Luchini |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Re: symlinks support [Was: Future of monotone] |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:30:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071116) |
Lapo Luchini wrote:
> PS: I don't know about SFU, but even if it did emulate them, they
> wouldn't work using plain "native" processes anyway, I guess.
>
Just as I suspected:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/technetmag/issues/2005/05/InterOp/
SFU and the Interix subsystem support both hard and symbolic links. The
hard links are completely visible both from the Win32 subsystem and the
Interix subsystem, but the symbolic links are only supported under the
Interix subsystem.
Lapo
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, (continued)
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, Peter Todd, 2008/01/27
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, jack-monotone, 2008/01/27
[Monotone-devel] Re: symlinks support [Was: Future of monotone],
Lapo Luchini <=
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, Brian May, 2008/01/28
[Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Graydon Hoare, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Thomas Moschny, 2008/01/28
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Bruce Stephens, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Thomas Moschny, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Markus Schiltknecht, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Thomas Moschny, 2008/01/28
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Bruce Stephens, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Thomas Moschny, 2008/01/28