[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] speed of "mtn ls branches"
From: |
William Uther |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] speed of "mtn ls branches" |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:17:30 +1100 |
On 17/01/2008, at 2:35 PM, Tony Tung wrote:
Hi,
I just downloaded monotone 0.38, and I found the command "mtn ls
branches" to take a lot longer than the previous version I was
using (0.35). Since I kept the old binary around, I did some
timing with the two binaries, same database. 0.35 takes 0.023s to
complete the operation while 0.38 takes 0.22s. Any idea why that
might be happening?
That is almost certainly due to the introduction of 'suspend' certs.
These were introduced in about 0.37 I think. They are a way of
removing a branch from the list of 'active' branches you see with 'ls
branches'. They take work to process though. If you want to ignore
suspend certs you can use the strangely named "--ignore-suspend-
certs" option. This should return things to the speed they were
before, but you will lose the suspend functionality.
Is the 0.2 seconds a huge issue for you?
Will :-}
- [Monotone-devel] speed of "mtn ls branches", Tony Tung, 2008/01/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] speed of "mtn ls branches",
William Uther <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] speed of "mtn ls branches", Zack Weinberg, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Monotone-devel] speed of "mtn ls branches", William Uther, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Monotone-devel] speed of "mtn ls branches", Zack Weinberg, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Monotone-devel] speed of "mtn ls branches", William Uther, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Monotone-devel] speed of "mtn ls branches", Zack Weinberg, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Monotone-devel] speed of "mtn ls branches", William Uther, 2008/01/17
Re: [Monotone-devel] speed of "mtn ls branches", Tony Tung, 2008/01/17