Re: [Monotone-debian] Re: Bug#482547: monotone: New upstream release available (0.40)

[Ludovic Brenta]

Zack Weinberg writes:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Zack Weinberg <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Well ... yes, but no.  0.40-1 has been ready since shortly after the
>> release, but I think it would be wise to skip that and go straight to
>> a -2 that addresses #480072 and #474280.  I was planning to work on it
>> tomorrow.
>
> I just pushed changes addressing the above bugs and hopefully also
> helping us get a handle on the other FTBFSes.  Please check and upload
> t:monotone-0.40-2.  I'm attaching the .diff.gz I got from a trial
> build, relative to the official monotone-0.40 tarball.  Note that
> Makefile.am got modified on the branch, so you may need to re-run
> automake, sigh.  Also, there are some file deletions in here.
>
> I can't do a proper signed .changes bundle for you, because my GPG key
> is only on the computer that's decided to crash once every half hour
> :(
>
> zw

Hi Zack, could you please fix the following:

$ lintian *.deb
W: monotone-doc: doc-base-abstract-might-contain-extra-leading-whitespaces 
monotone-manual:6
E: monotone-doc: doc-base-file-references-missing-file monotone-manual:16 
/usr/share/doc/monotone/monotone.pdf
W: monotone: copyright-without-copyright-notice

The error is due to monotone.pdf being gzipped, which is incorrect as
PDF files are already compressed.  dh_compress -X.pdf is necessary.  I
haven't looked at the warnings.

Since you've tagged 0.40-2 already, I guess -3 is in order :/

-- 
Ludovic Brenta.