|
From: | Paul Theodoropoulos |
Subject: | Re: monit status/summary |
Date: | Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:25:55 -0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/34.0 |
Hmm. Well, each is a separate config file (with
the exception of the two servercomm and two bucardo tests). They're
not in any order. address@hidden: /etc/monit/conf.d # ls -1 bucardo cron dnsupdate exim4 ntpd peervpn postgresql salt-minion servercomm snmpd sshd syslogd But - as before - it really doesn't matter. No sense expending cycles on an answer to a curiosity.. Thanks for the reply. On 12/9/14 6:37 AM, Martin Pala wrote:
Hi Paul, the output of status/summary is not sorted by name - it dumps the services in the same order which is used in the configuration file. Regards, MartinOn 06 Dec 2014, at 02:51, Paul Theodoropoulos <address@hidden> wrote: I've noticed that both monit status and monit summary output their info in reverse alpha order (with the exception of the 'system'), like so: Process 'syslogd' Running Process 'sshd' Running Process 'snmpd' Running Process 'servercomm-local' Running Program 'servercomm-main' Status ok Process 'salt-minion' Running Process 'postgresql' Running Process 'peervpn' Running Process 'ntpd' Running Process 'exim4' Running Process 'dnsupdate' Running Process 'cron' Running Program 'bucardo-proc' Status ok Program 'bucardo-sync' Status ok System 'xxx-yy-zzz-db1-primary' Running Is this by design, and if so, I'm curious what the rationale is. Obviously it's not a problem, it just pique's my interest. -- Paul Theodoropoulos www.anastrophe.com -- To unsubscribe: https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general -- Paul Theodoropoulos www.anastrophe.com |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |