[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Feature request: UDP generic protocol testing
From: |
Alex Black |
Subject: |
RE: Feature request: UDP generic protocol testing |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:25:04 -0400 |
> It may be a useful idea, we'll have to think about this more.
> No, this does not exist and I was just thinking aloud.
Ok. I would find it useful, I imagine others might too? I get too many
failure emails in some situations, when only one is desired.
> > An alternate idea would be to do
> > something like you have for service dependencies, using the depends
> > keyword.
>
> I think I like the parenthesis idea better :) IMHO the syntax
> is easier and more recognizable.
Ok.
> Yes, thats how the alert system is programmed now. The only
> overriding is if alert foo1 was defined in a check-entry, then only
> the check-entry alert is sent to foo1. I agree that it is be more
> logical if a check-entry override the global list. It's easy to
> change this, but it will affect backward compatibility. What do
> others think? Should this be changed?
If this change would cause backwards compatability problems perhaps the
functionality could be added in a slightly different way, perhaps
alert-override or something.
>
> --
> Jan-Henrik Haukeland
> Mobil +47 97141255
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general
>
- Re: Feature request: UDP generic protocol testing, (continued)
- Re: Feature request: UDP generic protocol testing, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2005/10/28
- Re: Feature request: UDP generic protocol testing [now with QUAKE3 support], Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2005/10/29
- Feature request: UDP generic protocol testing, Alex Black, 2005/10/24
- RE: Feature request: UDP generic protocol testing, Alex Black, 2005/10/25
- RE: Feature request: UDP generic protocol testing, Alex Black, 2005/10/27
- RE: Feature request: UDP generic protocol testing,
Alex Black <=