Re: Some feature notes for monit

[Martin Pala]

Hi,

> ### Access time changed by checks

This is not checked, possibly it could be. For performance reason i 
personaly usualy turn off atime on filesystem, thus this is not my cup 
of tea - maybe other developers are interested in it, or you can give it 
a stab ;) In such case, probably the timestamp test syntax should be 
more general ...

> ### Missing check: TIMESTAMP checks mtime only

Current timestamp test checks for mtime and ctime - the result is the 
bigger value.

> ### Missing check: general lstat(2) variable check

Described 'lstat change' test could be usefull only for definitely 
static objects, which is special case => because of general usage, it is 
probably better to test for specific attributes of monitored object, 
which are important to monitor, with appropriate limits definition. If 
there are some tests for specific attributes missing, we can add them.

Thanks for hints :)

Cheers,
Martin