Re: FYI

[Rory Toma]

Yes, one directive is better. Just ask Captain Kirk.

On Fri, 2002-06-28 at 12:40, Jan-Henrik Haukeland wrote:
> 
> Hehe, using two competing mailing lists is fun. Lets stick to
> address@hidden shall we :)
> 
> "Martin Pala" <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Rory Toma" <address@hidden>
> > To: <address@hidden>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:05 AM
> > Subject: Re: FYI
> > 
> > > I suppose we could allow both interface and specific
> > > hostnames/addresses. One needs the interface so you can specify eth0,
> > > vpn0, etc in the config file for the case of dynamic addressing.
> > >
> > > so you'd have:
> > >  set httpd port 2812
> > >  interface eth0
> > >  address 172.17.1.1
> > >  allow...
> > 
> > I think that it could be better to allow both types of interfaces to be
> > defined by the same directive (for example 'interface'). It keeps the monit
> > dictionary simpler for similar purpose. What do you think about it?
> 
> I second that
> 
> -- 
> Jan-Henrik Haukeland
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe:
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general
> 
-- 
Rory Toma               address@hidden
VP of Run Level 5       http://www.trs80.net
Digeo Digital           http://www.digeo.com

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part