[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?
From: |
Matt Birkholz |
Subject: |
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git? |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:58:12 -0700 |
> From: Chris Hanson <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:47:10 -0700
> [...]
> >
> > git-cvsimport (cvsps) crapped out on me. I quote:
> >
> > Unknown: error
> >
> > Maybe I will upgrade to Jaunty first...
>
> It won't help. There is some strangeness in the oldest entries that
> defeats git because it only works through the CVS command-line
> interface and is unable to deal with the way the revision numbers are
> sequenced. It uses heuristics to reassemble the tree, and the
> heuristics break down on these cases.
My import dies after printing this:
Fetching src/runtime/hash.scm v 1.27
I find that I cannot get revision 1.27 via cvs command line:
$ cvs update -r1.27 -p src/runtime/hash.scm
===================================================================
Checking out src/runtime/hash.scm
RCS: /cvsroot/mit-scheme/mit-scheme/v7/src/runtime/hash.scm,v
VERS: 1.27
***************
cvs [update aborted]: invalid change text in
/cvsroot/mit-scheme/mit-scheme/v7/src/runtime/hash.scm,v
Isn't "invalid change text" a problem in hash.scm,v?
The log for that file is a bit queer. Revision 13.46.1.1 is listed
last, after 1.27.
>[...] it's possible to get the RCS files from savannah for this
>purpose.
How do I get ahold of this weird hash.scm,v file?
- [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/04/25
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Taylor R Campbell, 2009/04/25
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/04/25
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Chris Hanson, 2009/04/26
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?,
Matt Birkholz <=
- Message not available
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/04/27
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/04/27
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/04/28
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/04/28
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/04/29
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] git?, Matt Birkholz, 2009/04/29