metacosm-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Metacosm-dev] Still alive


From: Chris Laprun
Subject: Re: [Metacosm-dev] Still alive
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 15:22:20 -0400

Hi all,

I am still alive as well! Sorry I haven't shown more signs of life but I have to admit that metacosm was somewhat put in the background for me (as it seems it has been for most of you as well or am I wrong in assuming that?)...

On Aug 10, 2003, at 11:28 AM, Benoît Sibaud wrote:

Hi,

after a long silence, some news about Metacosm:

- it compiles with gcj-3.3 (Makefile updated)

Cool.

- there is still a GPL violation with Xerces (Apache Public License), and
anyway Xerces is unneeded (replaced by libgcj). So some cleaning about
Xerces is needed. (at least META-INF/MANIFEST-controlpanel.MF,
META-INF/MANIFEST-metacosm.MF, META-INF/MANIFEST-zheroez.MF, INSTALL,
build.xml, controlPanel.properties,
org/metacosm/framework/server/AdminCommandStreamParser.java)

I have never been really interested in this licensing issues since I see them as hinderance and they were actually partly why I couldn't be bothered with metacosm anymore. I like open source and the GPL but not when it gets in the way of getting the job done... Anyway, I guess this is not really important for me to say that now! :)

- references to Piccolo removed (no need for Piccolo)

...

- metacosm.org domain. "Expiration Date:02-Sep-2003 17:17:47 UTC"

I am still the owner of the domain name and we don't currently use it since Savanna doesn't provide DNS redirection as SF was doing so I don't really see the point of renewing the domain name for metacosm itself unless we find a way to make use of the domain. More importantly, we should make sure that there are still people interested in working on the project...

UBiK




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]