[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Angelo.Graziosi: Problems with patched gnu make ? (was:Need Volunte

From: Angelo Graziosi
Subject: Re: [Angelo.Graziosi: Problems with patched gnu make ? (was:Need Volunteers to test patch for gnu make)]
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 02:36:24 +0200 (MET DST)

In the attached file there are a few logs:

1) build-gfortran-4.2.0-20061001.unpatched-full.log.bz2. 
The build of GFortran I did before you suggested 'make -p' with the
unpatched version of MAKE; it is completed without errors.

2) build-gfortran-make-patched-p-fail.log.bz2. 
The build I tried using 'make -p' and the PATCHED version of MAKE. It

3) build-gfortran-make-unpatched-p-works.log.bz2. 
The build with 'make -p' and the UNPATCHED version of MAKE. It works fine
without errors. I have cut it just a little after the critical point that
causes errors in 1).

For the sake of completeness I build with a script that:

tar -xjvf gcc-svn.tar.bz2

cd gcc

mkdir -p .build .inst

cd .build

../configure ....
make install


On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> > Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 12:27:23 +0200
> > From: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
> > Cc: address@hidden
> > 
> > My crystal ball says that VPATH or vpath might be the culprit, so
> > please try to look at those
> Running "make -p" will print the VPATH database, so you could see if
> there's something different between the two versions of Make in this
> regard.

Attachment: gfc-builds-log.tar.bz2
Description: Binary data

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]