[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re-order config.h.W32 to match the order of auto* generated config.h
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: Re-order config.h.W32 to match the order of auto* generated config.h |
|
Date: |
Sat, 09 Jul 2005 14:59:01 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 10:08:59 +0100
> From: "J. Grant" <address@hidden>
> CC: "Paul D. Smith" <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> > Wrt the last one: isn't the convention to #undef a symbol rather than
> > define it to zero?
>
> Agreed, often the convention is. I am not sure why this one is
> different in the ./configure generated config.h on MSYS/MinGW + GNU/Linux.
Paul, any thoughts on why configure does that in this case?
- Re-order config.h.W32 to match the order of auto* generated config.h, J. Grant, 2005/07/05
- Re: Re-order config.h.W32 to match the order of auto* generated config.h, Paul D. Smith, 2005/07/05
- Re: Re-order config.h.W32 to match the order of auto* generated config.h, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/07/05
- Re: Re-order config.h.W32 to match the order of auto* generated config.h, J. Grant, 2005/07/08
- Re: Re-order config.h.W32 to match the order of auto* generated config.h, Paul D. Smith, 2005/07/08
- Re: Re-order config.h.W32 to match the order of auto* generated config.h, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/07/09
- Re: Re-order config.h.W32 to match the order of auto* generated config.h, J. Grant, 2005/07/09
- Re: Re-order config.h.W32 to match the order of auto* generated config.h,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Re-order config.h.W32 to match the order of auto* generated config.h, Paul D. Smith, 2005/07/09
- Re: Re-order config.h.W32 to match the order of auto* generated config.h, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/07/09
- Re: Re-order config.h.W32 to match the order of auto* generated config.h, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/07/09
- Re: Re-order config.h.W32 to match the order of auto* generated config.h, J. Grant, 2005/07/09
- Re: Re-order config.h.W32 to match the order of auto* generated config.h, J. Grant, 2005/07/09