[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnu.org #1231740] gnu-misc-discuss broken?
From: |
Richard M. Stallman via RT |
Subject: |
Re: [gnu.org #1231740] gnu-misc-discuss broken? |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Jan 2018 21:15:28 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Mail to address@hidden will reach Ian as he is subscribed to the
> mailing list.
I didn't know who was on address@hidden I still don't know
who is there, other than you and Ian.
> Sending to mailman and sysadmin and Ian should
> receive three copies.
No worries, I didn't send it to iank directly.
> Having looked up the timestamps and determined that this was a message
> that came through in the middle of the US night and that it still only
> waited 3h15m for approval then I think that is quite good.
I agree. That was faster than I would expect we ought to be able to
do, in general. It looks like Colby had no reason to complain.
I do wonder why he thought his message was delayed, since it wasn't
delayed by waiting for the moderator -- but maybe he got confused.
> > Does the list simply have very light traffic?
> Yes. It has been a very low traffic mailing list.
I am surprised. I think that 20 years ago it was generally full of flames.
Perhaps nowadays people don't usually think of criticizing us
using a mailing list.
Anyway, given that it is working, I am not complaining about the lack
of flames there.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See https://stallman.org/skype.html.
lists that drop nonmember mail [was gnu-misc-discuss broken?], Ian Kelling, 2018/01/23