lzip-bug
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Lzip-bug] Lzip 1.20-pre2 released


From: Timothy Beryl Grahek
Subject: Re: [Lzip-bug] Lzip 1.20-pre2 released
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 07:25:37 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0

Hi Antonio,

Compressing an already compressed file is rarely useful, but you can do it using the option '-F, --recompress':

If I have more questions about this, I will open another thread.

Thanks. What you propose seems like "greedy" reporting; report everything that went or will go wrong, or may be interesting to know. I think the norm is to complain only when a problem is found.

I appreciate your observation regarding my proposal and your decision to act in contrast to it; acting in contrast to it is definitely the most sensible approach, especially given what you have said.

Thanks again for your help.

Thus far I have installed and used Lzip 1.20 Pre2 on my home machine and work machine. Both machines have this version installed on both of their operating systems. My home machine has it installed on Arch Linux x86-64 and Windows 10 using Cygwin, and my work machine has the exact same configuration. I have run into no problems compressing or decompressing files on either machine. For example, I was compressing some disk images at work, and I was compressing and decompressing some files for my college classes at home and at work. Lzip 1.20 Pre2 appears to be as stable as Lzip 1.19. This certainly agrees with what you said previously about the fact that Lzip 1.20 addresses the interface rather than function when comparing it with Lzip 1.19.

In other words, the testing I have done now, after the first testing I have done on Lzip 1.20 Pre2, is general day-to-day use testing. When time permits, next I will do more in depth, detailed testing that will allow me to provide a more detailed report as to what I have actually tangibly tested. Of course I will also comment on any day-to-day use I have done in a more descriptive fashion.

Best regards,

Timothy Beryl Grahek





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]