[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] Re. lynx in shmat_ccs12.pdf
|
From: |
Thorsten Glaser |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] Re. lynx in shmat_ccs12.pdf |
|
Date: |
Tue, 6 Nov 2012 17:57:49 +0000 (UTC) |
Thomas Dickey dixit:
>It was reported in private email
Ah okay then.
>The report of course applies to GnuTLS only - which offhand accounts
>for something less than half of the users. The text of the advisory
>is misleading since it states "all versions".
Right. Nevertheless, when time permits and ASAP, I’ll have
another look at the OpenSSL version. Though I don’t know
whether I want to not look at the CN in presence of a
subjectAltName, for better compatibility…
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Solange man keine schmutzigen Tricks macht, und ich meine *wirklich*
schmutzige Tricks, wie bei einer doppelt verketteten Liste beide
Pointer XORen und in nur einem Word speichern, funktioniert Boehm ganz
hervorragend. -- Andreas Bogk über boehm-gc in d.a.s.r