[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: [Lynx-dev] lynx not honoring apache document root path
From: |
David Woolley |
Subject: |
Re: Fwd: [Lynx-dev] lynx not honoring apache document root path |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:17:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070509) |
Thomas Dickey wrote:
I had in mind to approach this by looking to see if I could find when/why
the leading "/" for a GET of a query is optional (or not).
It's required by HTTP. All within host relative addressing must be
handled by the client. (When sending to a proxy, the http://host also
needs to be sent, and it is also permitted, as an alternative to Host:
headers, for HTTP/1.1 clients.
Incidentally, one common cause of differential failure to resolve
relative URLs is the incorrect use of \ instead of /. I don't know if
that applies here.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
- Re: Fwd: [Lynx-dev] lynx not honoring apache document root path, (continued)
- Re: Fwd: [Lynx-dev] lynx not honoring apache document root path, Thomas Dickey, 2007/07/23
- Re: Fwd: [Lynx-dev] lynx not honoring apache document root path, Hendrik-Jan Heins, 2007/07/24
- Re: Fwd: [Lynx-dev] lynx not honoring apache document root path, David Woolley, 2007/07/24
- Re: Fwd: [Lynx-dev] lynx not honoring apache document root path, Thomas Dickey, 2007/07/24
- Re: Fwd: [Lynx-dev] lynx not honoring apache document root path, Hendrik-Jan Heins, 2007/07/24
- Re: Fwd: [Lynx-dev] lynx not honoring apache document root path, Thomas Dickey, 2007/07/24
- Re: Fwd: [Lynx-dev] lynx not honoring apache document root path, Thomas Dickey, 2007/07/25
- Re: Fwd: [Lynx-dev] lynx not honoring apache document root path,
David Woolley <=
- Re: Fwd: [Lynx-dev] lynx not honoring apache document root path, gilmap, 2007/07/16
Message not available