[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] important improvements
From: |
PBM . |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] important improvements |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Jun 2007 18:46:35 +0200 |
On 6/8/07, Thorsten Glaser <address@hidden> wrote:
I think he only wants to replace these functions by a more generic one?
"more generic one" already exist.
I for one also want to retain the functionality, but don't care too
much about the implementation (of course smaller = faster = easier
to maintain = better).
Maybe that functions could be usefull if called more than just one time
and not only from mainloop, but that functions are static and called only
once, of course smaller = faster = easier to maintain = better lynx.
Sorry folks but where I have written that I want that scrolling and
screening be removed from lynx?
- [Lynx-dev] important improvements, PBM ., 2007/06/08
- Message not available
- Re: [Lynx-dev] important improvements, hsv, 2007/06/08
- Re: [Lynx-dev] important improvements, Thorsten Glaser, 2007/06/08
- Re: [Lynx-dev] important improvements,
PBM . <=
- Message not available
- Re: [Lynx-dev] important improvements, hsv, 2007/06/09
- Re: [Lynx-dev] important improvements, Walter Ian Kaye, 2007/06/09
- Re: [Lynx-dev] important improvements, Thomas Dickey, 2007/06/09
- Re: [Lynx-dev] important improvements, Walter Ian Kaye, 2007/06/11
- Re: [Lynx-dev] important improvements, Thomas Dickey, 2007/06/11
- Re: [Lynx-dev] important improvements, PBM ., 2007/06/10
- Re: [Lynx-dev] important improvements, Henry Nelson, 2007/06/10
- Message not available
- Re: [Lynx-dev] important improvements, hsv, 2007/06/11
- Re: [Lynx-dev] important improvements, PBM ., 2007/06/11
- Re: [Lynx-dev] important improvements, Thomas Dickey, 2007/06/11