[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8
From: |
Thomas E. Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8 |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Aug 2000 11:43:03 -0400 (EDT) |
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000 address@hidden wrote:
> In a recent note, Thomas E. Dickey said:
>
> > Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 09:16:22 -0400 (EDT)
> >
> > > Hastily composed; poorly tested; integrate only if needed.
> >
> I meant that part. Probably won't even compile with ncurses.
> I'll rework. Does ncurses imply resizeterm(), or should I
> test separately for resizeterm?
very old versions of ncurses (before 1.9.9e) do not have resizeterm.
> It might have been the putenv()s that interfere with ncurses.
> I'll also try #ifdef around them.
hmm - that's a possibility (interfering with the SIGWINCH results).
> > well, it's the beginning of a new cycle, so I'll find time to test some.
> > (it's the ones at the end, to close out a patch that tend to be a
> > problem).
> >
> I know I submitted my patch late, after you had announced close out.
> I pretty much expected it to go to dev.9. I guess I got a free
> alpha test. :-(
I didn't actually say when the cutoff was - I've been rotating from
one program to another with occasional excursions. If I'm doing small
changes then I tend to work on those while I'm looking at the to-do items
from the mailing list, but if it's a larger change (like this one), I'll
start on my changes before I look at the to-do items (otherwise I'll not
get it done). In the latter case, it makes the time between patches
longer.
Not exactly an alpha test - I did test and see that most of the
differences between old/new versions seemed to be in the ncurses area.
--
T.E.Dickey <address@hidden>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, Thomas Dickey, 2000/08/24
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, pg, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, Thomas Dickey, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, pg, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, Thomas E. Dickey, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, pg, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8,
Thomas E. Dickey <=
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, pg, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, Thomas E. Dickey, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, pg, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, Thomas E. Dickey, 2000/08/25