[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject)
From: |
Klaus Weide |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject) |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Oct 1999 10:00:22 -0500 (CDT) |
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999 address@hidden wrote:
> However, this is not pleasant. The number of workarounds I've had to
> implement to work around Lynx's internal structures (the way forms are
> implemented internally baffles me, for example) and the broken Javascript
> out there (javascript: urls are supposed to return the resultant location -
> this is handled fine. Unfortunately 90% of the Javascript out there doesn't
> work like this, but works by setting document.location. This is somewhat
> handled, but only on a javascript: link.)
>
> There are a whole host of problems. A partial list:
>
> Lynx has no internal document structure
That alone seems to make javascript (as usually used) pretty much
pointless for lynx as it is.
Klaus
- [no subject], Matt Staley, 1999/10/19
- lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject), Leonid Pauzner, 1999/10/19
- lynx-dev Re: JavaScript again (was no subject), Matt Staley, 1999/10/19
- Re: lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject), Larry W. Virden, 1999/10/19
- Re: lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject), rjp, 1999/10/20
- Re: lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject),
Klaus Weide <=
- Re: lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject), rjp, 1999/10/22
- Re: lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject), Klaus Weide, 1999/10/22
- Re: lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject), rjp, 1999/10/22
- Re: lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject), David Woolley, 1999/10/24
- Re: lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject), rjp, 1999/10/24