[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, and a half-serious proposal
From: |
Vlad Harchev |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, and a half-serious proposal |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Oct 1999 03:49:32 +0500 (SAMST) |
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Klaus Weide wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Vlad Harchev wrote:
>
> > You still may be joking. Or at least complete "conditions can be combined
> > section" or so.
>
> I am not sure about that one. It falls under "details may vary..."
IMO combining options is somewhat excessive, and the actions are somewhat
non-orthogonal, not mutually exclusive (ie BEEP is the same as IGNORE, but
with bell, etc). When such doubts arise, this means that the option is
not properly designed.
> > And I don't want to code all this then - may be you?
>
> I am thinking about it. (Apparently not everybody regards it as
> too ridiculously complex, which surprises me...)
>
> Have you written something for LYForms.c beyond the example you had sent?
No. But I feel that it is excessive - IMO old CONFIRM_PREV_DOC was much more
atomal and orthogonal.
> Klaus
>
Best regards,
-Vlad
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/17
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, mattack, 1999/10/16
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/17
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/10/17
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, mattack, 1999/10/17
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, and a half-serious proposal, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/17
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, and a half-serious proposal, Vlad Harchev, 1999/10/18
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, and a half-serious proposal, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/18
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, and a half-serious proposal, Vlad Harchev, 1999/10/18
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, and a half-serious proposal, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/18
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, and a half-serious proposal,
Vlad Harchev <=
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, and a half-serious proposal, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/18
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, and a half-serious proposal, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/10/18
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/10/16
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, mattack, 1999/10/16
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, Vlad Harchev, 1999/10/16
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/16
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, Vlad Harchev, 1999/10/16
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/16
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, Vlad Harchev, 1999/10/16
- lynx-dev renaming and refinement of ex-STICKY_FIELDS (was "sticky" things), Klaus Weide, 1999/10/17