[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev LYMainLoop.c -- gcc signal 11, egcs-1.1.2
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev LYMainLoop.c -- gcc signal 11, egcs-1.1.2 |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Oct 1999 21:08:38 -0400 (EDT) |
>
> On Sun, 17 Oct 1999, brian j pardy wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 17, 1999, T.E.Dickey wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > Any suggestions on which functions to start with? Probably the main
> > > > loop. Also, I just noticed in what I have up there -- it says "cpp"
> > >
> > > yes - or the functions "handle_LYK_xxx" that I split-out of the main
> > > loop. That would be possibly better (since chopping out the main
> > > loop would leave a lot of orphaned private functions, while chopping
> > > out the functions themselves would just leave a lot of implicit
> > > declarations).
> >
> > I've narrowed it down to within handle_LYK_digit().
>
> Hmm. Is the GCC_UNUSED in
>
> BOOLEAN *, try_internal GCC_UNUSED)
>
> maybe confusing the compiler? The variable is unused in the case
> where you have no problem, but is used in the case where you do
> do have a problem.
it shouldn't (in fact, nothing should cause a signal 11).
> It seems it is clear that this is an error in the compiler, not
> in the code itself (it may only 'trigger' that error) - right?
right (and I may not be able to reproduce it even with the "same" compiler)
> Klaus
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey